Beautiful demoiselle

This is a damsel fly: a beautiful demoiselle, Calopteryx virgo.

This one is an immature male, it has the iridescent blue body of the mature male but not yet its dark blue-black wings, which develop over the first ten days of its life. If you look closely,  you can see the blue colouration beginning on the upper edge of the wings.

[1] An immature male beautiful demoiselle (Calopteryx virgo) photographed by DKG in 2018; [2] a mature male with dark blue wings (SMH).

The female also has brown wings but with a distinctive white spot; her body is iridescent green and the tip of her abdomen is bronze.

These lovely creatures, which rarely live as long as fifty days, are the end-stage of a complex underwater existence that began two years ago. Calopteryx virgo lives the greater part of its life as a larva or nymph; a fearsome predator among the roots of aquatic and  marginal plants in stream beds.

We seem to name a species for its adult form, even if that adult’s life is no more than a single day. If we named this species for the years it spends as a nymph rather than the few days it spends as an adult, we would call it the fanged riverbed stalker.

[3] female beautiful demoiselle by DKG; [4] final larval stage (CC0).

Over two years the nymph develops through a dozen larval stages, each ending with a moult, each moult revealing more and more adult-stage features. Before its final moult, the nymph will leave the water and climb through the vegetation into bushes or even trees, where its skin splits and  the adult finally emerges. The newly hatched adult does not move far until it has matured so we can assume that this one spent its larval stages in the park’s streams.

It is locally common but depends on good quality water. It is what is known as a bioindicator species: a species that gives us an idea of the health of a whole ecosystem. This immature male’s presence in our park tells us we are getting things right.

2 thoughts on “

  1. It was disappointing that there were hardly any demoiselles in the park this year. I only saw one and the damselfly and dragonfly numbers seem to have been much lower this year. Compared to the same time periods last year, it has been very quiet with regards to Odonata, and this was before most of the water had gone.

    1. Yes, less Odonata this year; and it’s possible that the drying out of some of our ponds and streams and the subsequent loss of Odonata nymphs will adversely affect the population for some years to come.

Comments are closed.

Create a website or blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: